- #Does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address update#
- #Does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address software#
Again LL has worked in the background and then announced their ruling by saying: The issue was obviously big enough to force a reaction form LL in something that very much looked like the past 'emerald gate' affair. And of course some RZ users saying, that they 'have a right' to know the alts what of course is something rather silly to say.īut anyway. Especially the one of not asking any consent for scanning and sharing the alt names around. The whole affair raged on for some time and while there have been false accusation, name calling and lots of drama involved the isseu had some valid points to it. Here is my advice, don't waste your money. I do find it amusing that redzone has removed the claim of infalibility from the marketplace advert, anyone with half a brain can see the problems with the system, but there are still enough people with the "if redzone says it, it must be true" mentality. Third, anyone who is copybotting is either going to be avoiding redzone detection (see ) or a client not capable of media streams anyway, making the whole thing pointless. Second, for those who have statically assigned IP addresses, what right does anyone other than Linden Lab have to know who anyones alts are? (Does redzone share bans over its network? I can't say but if it does, this is a big problem). In those cases, someone totally honest may be decried as a copybotter simply because they happen to have been assigned an IP address which happend to have been used by a copybotter previously, and with no way to prove otherwise and, much more importantly, no authority to apeal to. An IP address may be shared by multiple people in a house or halls of residence, might be assigned to an internet cafe or might be one of dynamic pool assigned by an ISP when a customer connects. You can ban someone by IP address but an IP address isn't necessarily a reliable way to identify a user. One of the big problems is, it simply is unreliable. While I'm still skeptical that this controversy is extremely widespread through the Second Life community, I regret not noting noting this aspect in the original post, and certainly didn't mean to downplay the legitimate concerns over this feature. UPDATE, 2/28: As many readers point out in Comments, as significant a privacy concern as IP tracking (if not moreso) is the way Redzone is able to connect Second Life users with their alt accounts.
![does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address](https://www.internetvnpthanoi.com/Content/Images/uploaded/09.2019/goidoanhnghiep2019.png)
#Does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address software#
Oh yeah, before you weigh in with your comments about Redzone's IP address tracking software, keep in mind that if you post here, this Typepad blogging software lets me, well, track your IP address. However, it's quite possible I'm missing something - is there more to this than the sudden realization that Internet services generally make IP tracking quite easy? And while we're at it, how much of a concern is this for Redzone, the popular Second Life industrial band of the same name but no apparent relation to the program? And, of course, Copybot and alt account users. (Even though, on investigation, few if any seemed actually harmed by the program.) Right now, I'm inclined to think it's a deep concern mainly to a vociferous minority who are vigilantly protective over their privacy. I can definitely say from experience that the controversy is not anywhere close to that raised by the 2006 Copybot panic, which temporarily brought Second Life activity to its knees. But one still hears a rumbling discontent here and there. Which should, you would think, settle the matter. "We do not consider IP gathering to be an actionable security exploit," Samuel Linden pronounced in a related JIRA ticket.
![does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/221340852_IP_routing_processing_with_graphic_processors/links/00b7d523ca69f2e1ec000000/largepreview.png)
In any case, the Lindens have deemed the complaint not worth any more consideration from the company:
![does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address](https://static.filehorse.com/screenshots/firewalls-and-security/hide-my-ip-screenshot-04.png)
However, it's unclear how much of a "war" this controversy actually amounts to: The JIRA thread has less than 1500 "votes" from Residents who consider the request valid and important. You can also get an anti-Redzone perspective from a blog post by Avril Korman, " Second Life Erupts In a War Over Privacy". Some in Second Life consider Redzone a violation of their privacy, and consequently, there is a painfully long comment thread in a JIRA technical support request, created by Residents demanding the Lindens deem Redzone a violation of the company's Terms of Service. (So for example, if you ban a Resident suspected of using Cobybot from your store, he can't come back minutes later with an alt account.) The controversy stems over how Redzone determines who has an alt account: By using a feature in Second Life's media streaming service to track a user's IP address. There's a low boil Second Life imbroglio over Redzone, a popular detection device that's designed to block users of Copybot content theft software, including any alternate avatar accounts they might use.
![does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address](http://changemyipaddress.com/images/hide-your-ip-baner.jpg)
#Does darkstorm viewer hide your ip address update#
2/28: Important update at bottom of post.